安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
檢舉此篇文章
... well, I suppose Herakleios had some ideas.
I think I'd add in a not BYZ requirement. Greeks could still form it with that, but not the surviving part of the Roman Empire.
Africa and Maghreb region were very different parts of the continent during Antiquity, simply because the Sahara desert was to big to allow people to travel through it. So they were more related to the Greeks than the Africans or even Egyptians.
Carthaginians & canaans were semitic people originating in the region of Palestine, from linguistics to religion and so on semitic. In other words the closest thing ingame would be either hebrew in the lost cultures category or from other cultures literally arabic. The next closest one would be Tamazight or berbers as while they were not semitic in any shape, they did intermarry & berber languages adopted some canaanite vocabulary.
I think Tunis (should be renamed "Ifriqiya") could be allowed to form it, but under the current conditions this would mean they'd always form Carthage unless territorial requirements are upped such that the tag would have to expand outwards enough..