安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题








I don't throw the word gamebreaking around lightly but quite often your nation goes in an infinite feedback loop of disaster after disaster due to their being so many and most overlap.
Secondly the cossack estate shouldnt be in every nation if any at all, it is over encombering combined with other estates and does not fit the lore.
Thirdly, the ability to create client states should be removed as something every nation can do from the beginning
fourthly nations should begin with less than their forcelimit like in vanilla for gameplay reasons. Most nations seem to start being way over their forcelimit
I have never created custom unit sprites, so chance for now is low.
I have plans for it.
1) I do not think that revolutions and country collapse are unnecessary because, in my plan, that should prohibit creation of BBB.
2) I am aware of loop possibility with disasters, and hope that Weekend Gameplay update will fix it.
3) Vassals stats will be rebalanced, so it should help to avoid too overpowering.
Nordic Pantheon could be called Sovngarde for example or even just Nordic would be better tbh
Nordic or Atmoran sounds best to me. When I was thinking Sovngarde I had the idea of Dharmic reigions in my head where the name Dharmic is based of the belief system of Dharma, but after posting I realised Dharmic was a grouping (like Abrahamic) and not a religion so oops