Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem



































Artificial ecosystems can offer nearly the same efficiency, and with a much smaller footprint. And they are much more efficient compared to a partial hydroponics setup.
As such, Artificial ecosystems are only 97.34% of the power/harvest efficiency when compared to a sunlamp and 24 hydroponics bays, when the sunlamp is provided power by a constant source with overnight storage in a 50% eff battery. If using a 100% battery mod, or using load following power generators, the hydroponics setup requires only 3738Wd, while the artificial ecosystem only has 85.29% efficiency compared to this.
A sun lamp costs 2900W for 55% of the day. If you have some sort of load following mod or surplus solar power, this costs only 1595Wd. If you rely a lot on batteries, this means that each sunlamp costs an average of 2058Wd (due to the 50% charge efficiency)
Lets assume the worst case, a constant power supply of 2058W needed for the sunlamp alone + at least one battery. Add in 24 hydroponics basins, each with a constant 70W requirement, and now a sunlamp+24hydroponics requires 3738W of power. With 96 growing tiles and a 280% growth rate over 55% of the day, you can expect 48.52 riceplant harvests per day.