安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



































Artificial ecosystems can offer nearly the same efficiency, and with a much smaller footprint. And they are much more efficient compared to a partial hydroponics setup.
As such, Artificial ecosystems are only 97.34% of the power/harvest efficiency when compared to a sunlamp and 24 hydroponics bays, when the sunlamp is provided power by a constant source with overnight storage in a 50% eff battery. If using a 100% battery mod, or using load following power generators, the hydroponics setup requires only 3738Wd, while the artificial ecosystem only has 85.29% efficiency compared to this.
A sun lamp costs 2900W for 55% of the day. If you have some sort of load following mod or surplus solar power, this costs only 1595Wd. If you rely a lot on batteries, this means that each sunlamp costs an average of 2058Wd (due to the 50% charge efficiency)
Lets assume the worst case, a constant power supply of 2058W needed for the sunlamp alone + at least one battery. Add in 24 hydroponics basins, each with a constant 70W requirement, and now a sunlamp+24hydroponics requires 3738W of power. With 96 growing tiles and a 280% growth rate over 55% of the day, you can expect 48.52 riceplant harvests per day.