安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









@Illegal Marble Do you have vsync on or a frame limiter at all on your graphics console? Maybe some graphics setting that only affects the campaign?
@Ambiguous_Oat Thanks
I have enabled frame generation through the AMD software, makes the frames go all over the place but atleast i get more that 100 FPS like this, i know most of these frames are "fake" but its honestly better than nothing at this point. Il give the lossless scaling software a try later, looks very promising and the only "fix" worth doing for trying to optimize this CA ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ of a game.
@Ed Kaufman Happy to help
frame dropping in very large battles or in campaign map is not acceptable at all with my current hardware and i have not had enough of this game yet so i would really recommend it as it makes it buttery smooth in Attila very large battles of at any point at the campaign map is what i have been dreaming of since release
so , no its not a bad or normal experience
its a glorious experience in my opinion of course :D
@Emir Ismael The only issue with lossless scaling (and it is a great workaround for games that you can't do it otherwise like command and conquer) is that it will double, triple fps etc however not the frame timings so the experience will always be inferior to actually rendering more frames.
always :D