安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题









The sticking point (at least for me) is going without hacking. If the hacking module on the flagship latches onto something vital, it can ruin a solid run so, at least when writing this guide, I made a rule to always have a hard counter packed. Though a top artillery and cloaking might be able to best it, so that's certainly an interesting angle worth trying! Thank for the heads-up on that. Interstellar_Dragonet
-> if your weapon system is destroyed and/or hacked, you still have the artilery system, and reverselly
-> the artillery won't go out immediatly after taking damage, unlike a weapon who got 1 of the energy it use damaged
-> the artillery system doesn't use the weapon system energy, which mean that you can have effectivelly up to 4 more energy on weapons than on a ship that doesn't have the said artillery
The disadvantages are:
-> more energy spent on weapons mean less energy for the rest of the ship
-> you can't control the artillery
.
These advantages are why I thing that the Fregatidae flack artillery at 4 energy isn't that far fetched, even if I understand the criticism.
Thanks dude