安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



There's people that get very defensive about having their ideas confronted because of insecurity. Or ego. A lot of times, it's both.
Then there's people that might have not understood the argument made by the other person. You can't prove me wrong if I'm missing the point you're trying to make.
Then there's people that pretend to miss the point. They understood you alright, but they're playing dumb because they never had any intention of exchanging ideas, they only cared about being percived as "in the right". This are the worst of the worst. Nothing makes me more violently angry than a person that's clearly pretending to be stupid.
Thankfully the ones in OT make themselves painfully obvious and easy to block.
2 outta three ain't bad. Just at the moment of the closing argument began to slur speech from the weekender of breathing paper to conduct this research to defeat ,e.
Proved wrong how was proved wrong was wrong. Not sure this is tied to a tongue twister or a unleash the dragon song from supposedly sisqó
Say the strongest survived protecting the meek.
Ehm, I need some example?
Often people would consider argument "settled" when they bring in some facts from a "reputable source", however who can vouch these facts are true?
Or in other cases, if somebody argues against the majority's opinion, they get heckled & laughed at, but their position might actually be right and majority be wrong.
So even if you think you are 100% right and won the audience - it doesn't mean your are actually right.