安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



I myself see a lot of difference between 60 to 120, but as I've never had a machine that could run a game with more than that, I can't really talk about it
Below 60 i can see it. Under 120, i can feel it. Framegen and stuff doesnt help the feel either. The input lag is the same.
Personally i can make things go super fast at around 140 frames and yet my monitor only supports 75Hz.
I think it's part frames, part ping and part mouse dpi.
Just remember that going too fast actually makes a disadvantage, I had to tune things down for better accuracy in online games.
Keep using high fps for about 2-3 weeks, then switch back to 60fps. You'll feel the difference instantly once you moved the mouse across the desktop screen.
Also, check out this interesting topic.
https://steamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/discussions/forum/12/601897401881485890
ooo I know what you're talking about, dissociatives too
to the point of making games and movies look jarring
but this is on user-end, not computer-end....
On the computer end, yeah beyond 100 the gains are smaller, but there is some. It's hard to get most games to run that fast with high gfx settings tho, unless they are old. Framegen does help that some now.
Lain has spoken. 😄
Nobody can, but let's continue to let them think they can. Who are we to convince them otherwise?
Gamer No.1: I can see the difference, bro.
Gamer No.2: Wow, you're amazing, dude.
Gamer No.1: Yeah, I can see things at 300fps that even the game developers didn't know existed.
Gamer No.2: Your killin' me, dude.