Cài đặt Steam
Đăng nhập
|
Ngôn ngữ
简体中文 (Trung giản thể)
繁體中文 (Trung phồn thể)
日本語 (Nhật)
한국어 (Hàn Quốc)
ไทย (Thái)
Български (Bulgaria)
Čeština (CH Séc)
Dansk (Đan Mạch)
Deutsch (Đức)
English (Anh)
Español - España (Tây Ban Nha - TBN)
Español - Latinoamérica (Tây Ban Nha cho Mỹ Latin)
Ελληνικά (Hy Lạp)
Français (Pháp)
Italiano (Ý)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesia)
Magyar (Hungary)
Nederlands (Hà Lan)
Norsk (Na Uy)
Polski (Ba Lan)
Português (Tiếng Bồ Đào Nha - BĐN)
Português - Brasil (Bồ Đào Nha - Brazil)
Română (Rumani)
Русский (Nga)
Suomi (Phần Lan)
Svenska (Thụy Điển)
Türkçe (Thổ Nhĩ Kỳ)
Українська (Ukraina)
Báo cáo lỗi dịch thuật



300 fps = Honey bee, wasps, etc...
200 - 300 fps = Tiger and Dragonfly
120 fps = Various birds
100 fps = House cat
60 fps = Lion
30 - 60fps = Human
30 fps = Shark
If I am really well rested and in the zone I can see frames render before they're completed which is like 150ms faster than normal
It's incredibly taxing on my brain so I would say I can't do it for more than a few hours before being fatigued. Human eye should definitely see past 60fps. When you get a bunch of adrenaline you can see things happen in "slowed down time". Only way that is possible is " more fps" essentially
Ladies and Gentlemen, behold your impending Doom!
https://proxy.yuanyoumao.com/app/2280/DOOM__DOOM_II/
But what about the body? The fastest human/runner clocked in @ 23.35mph.
A missing 'e' .
No that is what movies are shot in.
Indeed I don't know how to explain it but cs2 does render frames and displays them and then they finish rendering and then disappear. It's hard to see this stuff but sometimes in a flow state, time goes by a bit slower in the moment.
Quick googling.
Some experts will tell you that the human eye can see between 30 and 60 frames per second. Some maintain that the human eye may be able to see much more than that although more research is needed. Visual stimuli are measured in frames per second
If I get really technical, the majority of people here would be confused while lost in translation.
The fact is that 24 is a misconception with younger gamer generations which came from, of course, a content creator not a scientist.