安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



needing something in that budget that can do 1440p, i've used oled before and i'm not a huge fan surprisingly, didn't seem that different to a good ips
For the quality reputation? AOC is kinda garabge in term of QoL, but who doesnt this age, damn chinese manufature always bad
AOC is not "chinese"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOC_International
They think just because they forgot their heritage , they can br something else, come on be real
That statement seems a bit oversimplified tbh. VA and IPS aren’t strictly budget vs. quality technologies, they both have strengths and weaknesses depending on the use case, price range and implementation. There are low end and high end models of both VA and IPS panels.
For example, high end VA panels can deliver significantly better contrast and black levels than IPS and some of them are not budget at all. On the other hand, there are plenty of low cost entry-level IPS monitors that dont outperform VA in meaningful ways.
The choice really depends on priorities like contrast, color accuracy, response time, HDR performance, viewing angles, and price, not the panel type alone.
Could you clarify how you concluded that VA is only for “tight budgets” and IPS automatically equals “quality”? I’m curious about the reasoning behind that statement. No hate!
If someone would ask about my humble opinion, I'd go with a good VA panel with minor black smearing like a G7. The black level can't be matched by an IPS panel. If you are more into an allround monitor with good color accuracy and for fast paced games I'd probably go with an IPS panel.
Why no OLED or Mini-LED, if I may ask?
There are really good OLED monitors starting around $350 now, so dismissing OLED outright doesn’t make sense. Modern OLEDs come with multiple built in safety features to prevent burn-in, including pixel refresh cycles every few hours and a full panel refresh every 1000 hours. Many manufacturers, like Dell, LG and ASUS even offer 3year burn-in warranties.
Technology has advanced so much that the risk is practically negligible.
I’ve personally used OLEDs for over a decade without ever experiencing burn-in, even with static elements. I remember leaving The Witcher 3 running for 20 hours with a static HUD and forgetting about it while hanging out with friends and the display stayed perfect.
So who told you that OLEDs get burn-in within two years? That’s outdated information. Of course, VA, IPS, Mini-LED and OLED all have their strengths and weaknesses regarding contrast, color accuracy, viewing angles and response time but dismissing OLED outright based on old fears simply isn’t accurate anymore.
va is older, and can have higher refresh rates due to faster response times, but newer ips panels can run close or faster than older va
there is really no reason not to get a good ips at this time
oleds are better, but will still burn after a year or two of use
if you dont mind spending more now, and replacing the display in a few years go for it
but for a cheap good display that will last 10+ years, nothing wrong with ips
Whats the cheapest oled in your region? What about the Asus 1440p 280hz? You mention it will burn in 2 years they have a burnin warranty. And it takes serious efforr to burn them in you are robbing yourself of a modern monitor. Heres some facts a 120hz oled performs better than a 240hz va or ips.
Honestly, a lot of what you’re saying here isn't really accurate, with all due respect. VA panels are not inherently faster than IPS, as a matter of fact, VA has slower pixel response times especially in dark2dark transitions which is why older VA monitors often had noticeable smearing. Modern IPS panels can easily match or exceed VA in refresh rate and response time, with excellent color accuracy and viewing angles.
As for OLED, the idea that it will burn in after a year or two is simply a myth at this point. Modern OLED monitors have built-in pixel refresh cycles, full-panel refreshes, and most manufacturers even offer 3 year burn-in warranties. Why would they offer these warranties if OLEDs actually burned in after “a year or two”?
That doesn’t make any sense from an economic standpoint, these are huge tech companies trying to make a profit, not welfare organizations replacing your monitor for free every year.
With normal usage, the risk of burn-in is practically negligible, and plenty of people (myself included) have used OLEDs for years without ever seeing burn-in, even with static elements on the screen for extended periods. Heck I've seen people who've used their OLEDs for tehn thousands hours without any burn ins, so how is that possible?
That said, IPS is still a great allaround choice which is durable, color-accurate, and fast. VA panels still shine for deep contrast and dark scenes, though they can have minor smearing. So really, it comes down to what you value, either colors and speed (IPS), contrast and blacks (VA), or the ultimate color and contrast experience with modern OLED.
but using the ulmb method, any panel can be <1ms just depends on how long their controller flickers the backlight on for
oled pixel refresh and other tricks they do to hide burn just burns in the rest of the pixels to make it look even, burning the entire panel
an oled after 2 yrs of use will be less bright than when it was new