IPS or VA?
i have a VA monitor right now (crappy old 75hz dell) and wanting to upgrade to 1440p 180hz but i really want the good colours for cheap that VA offers (with black) but then VA also sucks in every other way
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 22 条留言
IPS nuff said
VA if you are on a very tight budget or IPS if you want quality
最后由 ♡ Kraken ♡ 编辑于; 13 小时以前
引用自 ˢᵈˣ FatCat
IPS nuff said
i'm considering the AOC Q27G4F, is it worth it to get?

needing something in that budget that can do 1440p, i've used oled before and i'm not a huge fan surprisingly, didn't seem that different to a good ips
最后由 Xuild 编辑于; 13 小时以前
引用自 Xuild
引用自 ˢᵈˣ FatCat
IPS nuff said
i'm considering the AOC Q27G4F, is it worth it to get?

needing something in that budget that can do 1440p, i've used oled before and i'm not a huge fan surprisingly, didn't seem that different to a good ips
worth by spec? or vendor, spec it is guuud, better if you can find something with DCI-P3 WITH 98%+
For the quality reputation? AOC is kinda garabge in term of QoL, but who doesnt this age, damn chinese manufature always bad
最后由 ˢᵈˣ FatCat 编辑于; 13 小时以前
引用自 ˢᵈˣ FatCat
引用自 Xuild
i'm considering the AOC Q27G4F, is it worth it to get?

needing something in that budget that can do 1440p, i've used oled before and i'm not a huge fan surprisingly, didn't seem that different to a good ips
worth by spec? or vendor, spec it is guuud, better if you can find something with DCI-P3 WITH 98%+
For the quality reputation? AOC is kinda garabge in term of QoL, but who doesnt this age, damn chinese manufature always bad
fyi
AOC is not "chinese"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOC_International
Wdym,they are. Always have been
They think just because they forgot their heritage , they can br something else, come on be real
Would you rather kiss a pig or a frog? I only ever used strobed VA and Fast IPS they both suck and need really high framerates aka 270+.
最后由 Rod 编辑于; 12 小时以前
引用自 ♡ Kraken ♡
VA if you are on a very tight budget or IPS if you want quality

That statement seems a bit oversimplified tbh. VA and IPS aren’t strictly budget vs. quality technologies, they both have strengths and weaknesses depending on the use case, price range and implementation. There are low end and high end models of both VA and IPS panels.

For example, high end VA panels can deliver significantly better contrast and black levels than IPS and some of them are not budget at all. On the other hand, there are plenty of low cost entry-level IPS monitors that dont outperform VA in meaningful ways.
The choice really depends on priorities like contrast, color accuracy, response time, HDR performance, viewing angles, and price, not the panel type alone.

Could you clarify how you concluded that VA is only for “tight budgets” and IPS automatically equals “quality”? I’m curious about the reasoning behind that statement. No hate!

If someone would ask about my humble opinion, I'd go with a good VA panel with minor black smearing like a G7. The black level can't be matched by an IPS panel. If you are more into an allround monitor with good color accuracy and for fast paced games I'd probably go with an IPS panel.

Why no OLED or Mini-LED, if I may ask?
最后由 Schrute_Farms_B&B 编辑于; 11 小时以前
引用自 Schrute_Farms_B&B
引用自 ♡ Kraken ♡
VA if you are on a very tight budget or IPS if you want quality

That statement seems a bit oversimplified tbh. VA and IPS aren’t strictly budget vs. quality technologies, they both have strengths and weaknesses depending on the use case, price range and implementation. There are low end and high end models of both VA and IPS panels.

For example, high end VA panels can deliver significantly better contrast and black levels than IPS and some of them are not budget at all. On the other hand, there are plenty of low cost entry-level IPS monitors that dont outperform VA in meaningful ways.
The choice really depends on priorities like contrast, color accuracy, response time, HDR performance, viewing angles, and price, not the panel type alone.

Could you clarify how you concluded that VA is only for “tight budgets” and IPS automatically equals “quality”? I’m curious about the reasoning behind that statement. No hate!

If someone would ask about my humble opinion, I'd go with a good VA panel with minor black smearing like a G7. The black level can't be matched by an IPS panel. If you are more into an allround monitor with good color accuracy and for fast paced games I'd probably go with an IPS panel.

Why no OLED or Mini-LED, if I may ask?
budget, not shelling out 1 thousand dollars on a monitor that'll get burn in within 2 years
My man, you’re starting again with the conspiracy stuff. Can we just have a single conversation based on facts, without bias? Please.

There are really good OLED monitors starting around $350 now, so dismissing OLED outright doesn’t make sense. Modern OLEDs come with multiple built in safety features to prevent burn-in, including pixel refresh cycles every few hours and a full panel refresh every 1000 hours. Many manufacturers, like Dell, LG and ASUS even offer 3year burn-in warranties.
Technology has advanced so much that the risk is practically negligible.

I’ve personally used OLEDs for over a decade without ever experiencing burn-in, even with static elements. I remember leaving The Witcher 3 running for 20 hours with a static HUD and forgetting about it while hanging out with friends and the display stayed perfect.

So who told you that OLEDs get burn-in within two years? That’s outdated information. Of course, VA, IPS, Mini-LED and OLED all have their strengths and weaknesses regarding contrast, color accuracy, viewing angles and response time but dismissing OLED outright based on old fears simply isn’t accurate anymore.
最后由 Schrute_Farms_B&B 编辑于; 10 小时以前
引用自 ♡ Kraken ♡
VA if you are on a very tight budget or IPS if you want quality
there are budget ips displays cheaper than va

va is older, and can have higher refresh rates due to faster response times, but newer ips panels can run close or faster than older va

there is really no reason not to get a good ips at this time

oleds are better, but will still burn after a year or two of use
if you dont mind spending more now, and replacing the display in a few years go for it

but for a cheap good display that will last 10+ years, nothing wrong with ips
引用自 Xuild
引用自 Schrute_Farms_B&B

That statement seems a bit oversimplified tbh. VA and IPS aren’t strictly budget vs. quality technologies, they both have strengths and weaknesses depending on the use case, price range and implementation. There are low end and high end models of both VA and IPS panels.

For example, high end VA panels can deliver significantly better contrast and black levels than IPS and some of them are not budget at all. On the other hand, there are plenty of low cost entry-level IPS monitors that dont outperform VA in meaningful ways.
The choice really depends on priorities like contrast, color accuracy, response time, HDR performance, viewing angles, and price, not the panel type alone.

Could you clarify how you concluded that VA is only for “tight budgets” and IPS automatically equals “quality”? I’m curious about the reasoning behind that statement. No hate!

If someone would ask about my humble opinion, I'd go with a good VA panel with minor black smearing like a G7. The black level can't be matched by an IPS panel. If you are more into an allround monitor with good color accuracy and for fast paced games I'd probably go with an IPS panel.

Why no OLED or Mini-LED, if I may ask?
budget, not shelling out 1 thousand dollars on a monitor that'll get burn in within 2 years

Whats the cheapest oled in your region? What about the Asus 1440p 280hz? You mention it will burn in 2 years they have a burnin warranty. And it takes serious efforr to burn them in you are robbing yourself of a modern monitor. Heres some facts a 120hz oled performs better than a 240hz va or ips.
引用自 _I_
引用自 ♡ Kraken ♡
VA if you are on a very tight budget or IPS if you want quality
there are budget ips displays cheaper than va

va is older, and can have higher refresh rates due to faster response times, but newer ips panels can run close or faster than older va

there is really no reason not to get a good ips at this time

oleds are better, but will still burn after a year or two of use
if you dont mind spending more now, and replacing the display in a few years go for it

but for a cheap good display that will last 10+ years, nothing wrong with ips

Honestly, a lot of what you’re saying here isn't really accurate, with all due respect. VA panels are not inherently faster than IPS, as a matter of fact, VA has slower pixel response times especially in dark2dark transitions which is why older VA monitors often had noticeable smearing. Modern IPS panels can easily match or exceed VA in refresh rate and response time, with excellent color accuracy and viewing angles.

As for OLED, the idea that it will burn in after a year or two is simply a myth at this point. Modern OLED monitors have built-in pixel refresh cycles, full-panel refreshes, and most manufacturers even offer 3 year burn-in warranties. Why would they offer these warranties if OLEDs actually burned in after “a year or two”?
That doesn’t make any sense from an economic standpoint, these are huge tech companies trying to make a profit, not welfare organizations replacing your monitor for free every year.

With normal usage, the risk of burn-in is practically negligible, and plenty of people (myself included) have used OLEDs for years without ever seeing burn-in, even with static elements on the screen for extended periods. Heck I've seen people who've used their OLEDs for tehn thousands hours without any burn ins, so how is that possible?

That said, IPS is still a great allaround choice which is durable, color-accurate, and fast. VA panels still shine for deep contrast and dark scenes, though they can have minor smearing. So really, it comes down to what you value, either colors and speed (IPS), contrast and blacks (VA), or the ultimate color and contrast experience with modern OLED.
引用自 Schrute_Farms_B&B
引用自 _I_
there are budget ips displays cheaper than va

va is older, and can have higher refresh rates due to faster response times, but newer ips panels can run close or faster than older va

there is really no reason not to get a good ips at this time

oleds are better, but will still burn after a year or two of use
if you dont mind spending more now, and replacing the display in a few years go for it

but for a cheap good display that will last 10+ years, nothing wrong with ips

Honestly, a lot of what you’re saying here isn't really accurate, with all due respect. VA panels are not inherently faster than IPS, as a matter of fact, VA has slower pixel response times especially in dark2dark transitions which is why older VA monitors often had noticeable smearing. Modern IPS panels can easily match or exceed VA in refresh rate and response time, with excellent color accuracy and viewing angles.

As for OLED, the idea that it will burn in after a year or two is simply a myth at this point. Modern OLED monitors have built-in pixel refresh cycles, full-panel refreshes, and most manufacturers even offer 3 year burn-in warranties. Why would they offer these warranties if OLEDs actually burned in after “a year or two”?
That doesn’t make any sense from an economic standpoint, these are huge tech companies trying to make a profit, not welfare organizations replacing your monitor for free every year.

With normal usage, the risk of burn-in is practically negligible, and plenty of people (myself included) have used OLEDs for years without ever seeing burn-in, even with static elements on the screen for extended periods. Heck I've seen people who've used their OLEDs for tehn thousands hours without any burn ins, so how is that possible?

That said, IPS is still a great allaround choice which is durable, color-accurate, and fast. VA panels still shine for deep contrast and dark scenes, though they can have minor smearing. So really, it comes down to what you value, either colors and speed (IPS), contrast and blacks (VA), or the ultimate color and contrast experience with modern OLED.
g-g times va is generally faster than ips

but using the ulmb method, any panel can be <1ms just depends on how long their controller flickers the backlight on for

oled pixel refresh and other tricks they do to hide burn just burns in the rest of the pixels to make it look even, burning the entire panel
an oled after 2 yrs of use will be less bright than when it was new
最后由 _I_ 编辑于; 10 小时以前
There's good VA panels if you want good contrast/blacks thats cheaper than either mini led monitors or oled... do your research but not all VA panels smear/blur and can get as good as IPS.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 22 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50