安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
16 
举报此帖
Almost everyone that doesn't "get it", are PC builders people and/or those with +-2K or higher gaming PC's.
Yes ofc your 1.5K gaming PC will be better, that's not the point, the point is to deliver a ready to go entree level gaming pc for those that DON't. (aka the hordes running ♥♥♥♥♥♥ notebook(s) and decade old PC's.
And the last thing they should do is implement different tier level steam machines, this will only fragment their ecosystem. The alternative for those that want the best of the best already exists: it's called regular gaming PC's.
valve never learns
If someone wants 2K thing ok ,builders everywhere . My old PC is faster .i like to tinker and be able to upgrade and change things . But many dont bother with this , their field of knowledge is different and they need something user friendly .i guess Steam Machine would be ok for them.
I have also read there is a 30% performance boost with Steam OS compared to a Windows 11 machine with similar hardware to Steam machine, it's never going to out do top end hardware but it's a good option for those mentioned, especially if Valve get the price right and besides it's tiny and can fit almost anywhere so that's a plus.
The first Steam Machines literally weren't made by Valve. I remember them. They were all third party devices using the first version of Valve's SteamOS operating system.
That was the root of the problem. You had multiple companies like Alienware, iBuyPower, CyberpowerPC, and the like all making their own models of the Steam Machine. Some which were more powerful than others, but all were kinda underpowered a bit if I remember right.
Not having a one-size fits all approach to hardware meant some games would work better or worse depending on your model, which is confusing to customers and people who would normally be interested in buying them.
Second problem was that official Linux support for games was nonexistant. At the time of the first Steam Machines, Linux only had a few supported games on Steam, compared to Windows which made up support for like 99% of all games.
That problem was unofficially solved by Valve. A few years ago, Steamplay Proton was created. It was a compatibility layer to "translate" games made for Microsoft Windows Operating Systems, into programs that Linux could "understand" and run. It's not perfect, but in the leadup to the release of the Steam Deck, Proton ensured the vast majority of games could be played on Linux, a lot of them with no tweaks at all from gamers, although some games aren't perfect and some games refuse to run still. Things like Kernel Level Anticheat for instance don't play nice with Linux, though some anticheat software, like EasyAntiCheat, have versions that detect and support Linux / SteamOS, it's just devs had to enable them.
The new Steam Machine solves the two biggest problems the original releases had. They all use the same hardware (outside of storage capacity), and can rely on Steamplay Proton for compatibility with the majority of games on Steam.
They just have to stick the price point. If it's not prohibitively expensive (i.e 900-900+ USD), then it can probably become a pretty decent alternative for newer PC gamers and a ready-to-go option for people who want a console experience from their PC (or an HTPC).
Personally, I'd love to see adoption of SteamOS more. If it continues to get better it could provide an alternative to Windows as a mandatory OS for gaming.
BUT
There likely will be more powerful machines with preinstalled SteamOS from other brands (Lenovo, Asus, etc.)
AND
There will be YT tutorials, potentially from channels like Linus Tech Tips and Gamer’s Nexus, showing how to install SteamOS on any full AMD device or Bazzite Linux if with Nvidia GPU.
Steam Machine will be fine for a 1080p gaming box but we'll have to see prices and packages first. Sill have to wait until Q1/Q2 2026
I figure if it's not a PC good enough for GTA6 then basically what's the point. Cause that's going to be a good bar of measure whether you going to get that game or not.
Steam Machine will probably be only slightly better then Steam Deck. To play AAA games in smooth 1440p or 2160p (4K) you need to build your own and aim for at least RTX 5070... or get a PS5
Steam Machine actually seems decently powerful but the lack of RAM worries me, unless it's socketed and upgradable. it's a pass from me.
If the price will be attractive (just not more than other entry level gaming PC in the market), then it's a very good proposal for people who want a simple first PC but do not want to investigate what to buy.
People who can build their gaming PCs themselves would not buy it anyway. No matter what's inside. However, if the price will be attractive, I would be tempted to buy one and set it as a server at home...