安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
该主题的作者已标记一个回帖作为问题的解答。
讨论规则及指引
3 
举报此帖
I play online multiplayer games without any issue.
DRM and Kernel Level Anti-Cheat not working on Linux is a benefit, not a loss. Those two things are both literally viruses
Anti-Cheat works on Linux and so does DRM, you just can't use Kernel Level versions of them. That's not anything to do with Linux and everything to do with publishers.
Don't blame Linux, blame the publishers. They're the ones who won't use DRM or Anti-Cheat that's not kernel level.
"Give us complete access to you computer."
"Uhhh... no?"
"Well, you can't play this game then."
"... good?"
Im not saying kernel level anti cheat is a good thing? Its a terrible thing.
THE TRUTH of the matter is that most popular multiplayer games that people have consoles for or "entry level gaming pcs" use them for is to play the big popular multiplayer games with their friends.
Im proposing Valve tries to make a compromise, no kernel level anti cheat or something like Server side anti cheat. Obviously you cant control companies to do what they want but the Steam machine really has no benefit if you already own a console lets be real.
And ive been on linux for two years. I've been on this platform and suffered not having multiplayer games on it because i like the experience better than windows.
I know its not all multiplayer games, but its a big majority of them which this steam machine is trying to target entry level gamers with. Multiplayer games are a major factor people dont switch from windows to Linux.
My biggest concern, as it has been with the Steam Deck, is that someone buys the Steam Machine excited to play Fortnite with their friends, only to discover they can't. Then they end up here, complaining and blaming everyone but themselves.
Yeah sadly the advertising for the steam machine has been just that, targeting entry level pc gamers and console players wanting to go to pc. That is my biggest concern too which is why i ask the question of who is this targeting? what is the audience for this?
Gaben and Valve, literally have the direct consumer numbers for who is playing what on Steam, like, Valve has all this data.
If they really thought that "so many people are playing kernel level anti-cheat DRM games that a Linux system isn't worthwhile" then they wouldn't have ever launched the Deck, or these new machines.
The success of the Deck showed that a Linux system is fine for a lot of what people want. It also made more devs/publishers support Linux as a whole. Along with the whole pushing of Proton forward.
Are online games a factor? Yeah?
Is it a big one? No. I don't think so.
Do some people ONLY play online games? Yeah.
Do they represent the majority of Steam gamers? No.
It just depends on what gamer you are? Do you like multiplayer games? yes? than do not buy the steam machine. But if you like everything else? Buy the steam machine.
I love the steam deck, But that goal was to compete with the switch and take that market. If people only wanted to play singleplayer games and emulators, The steam deck with the dock is just such a better pick? why do you need 5x more steam deck performance to play single player games Unless its just that unoptimized?
But I've not put much research into linux statistics or whatever for gaming. But I've seen alot when it comes to linux and multiplayer components. Games like Apex legends and other games stripping Linux support and all that jazz because "hackers".
The top 10 most popular games on steam are in fact multiplayer games. Except for the source SDK base 2007 at 10th spot. and all those except for counter strike 2 and Marvel rivals and dota 2 have Kernel level anti cheat
If you only play mulitplayer KLAC DRM games, then yeah, you don't want to use Linux. Obviously.
Gamers who only play KLAC DRM multiplayer games are a small section of gamers in general though, in my opinion. I think a SteamMachine will be fine.
The market has changed a lot, including Linux, since the release of the Deck.
If steam deck is already at EOL they wont be selling it.
I think it’s great they are bringing this to market. Traditionally steam has been more for pc gamers who can build own pc, tinker with stuff and are power users. This is not it - this is for mass market who don’t know or care what fps they have (or what it is).
I don’t agree that steam deck is there to compete with switch - I got a deck because I wanted to play some old pc games again and things I’ve missed after not gaming for 10 years. I’d never get a switch to play Nintendos games as I don’t care about Nintendo games. So basically they got me back into pc game market with ease of use. I am too old and too time constrained to work on hardware as well - I just want to play for an hour or two (but ended up being much more).
I think it will do wonders for Linux adoption on PC, maybe an official release of Steam OS for pc and hopefully push more publishers to care about the platform and work on bringing more games on the platform and not forcing the kernel level anti cheats.
https://graphicscardhub.com/cube-case-pc/
I love my Coolermaster HAF XB EVO case and hope they do a refresh of it at some point with current-gen USB front panel connection. And maybe tooless sliding Nvme caddies instead of Sata caddies. And maybe classic atomic purple shell.
https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/16bljch/anyone_know_of_any_good_atomic_purple_clear/
That aesthetic really needs to make a comeback. To hell with pointless RGB on everything.