引用自 Ben Lubar：

Games are required to fill out the content survey before they can launch their store page. The question about generative AI use is not optional.

引用自 ツ Sergio ツ：

Alright, let's flag then all games made with Unity, Unreal Engine, Godot etc. Clearly, it's important to clarify the tools that have been used for making the games.

引用自 Tamamo：

引用自 ツ Sergio ツ：

Alright, let's flag then all games made with Unity, Unreal Engine, Godot etc. Clearly, it's important to clarify the tools that have been used for making the games.

A wrench is a tool, it is designed to do a certain purpose with human effort. Photoshop is a tool, it is designed to do a certain purpose with human effort.

AI is not a tool, as it is akin to telling someone else to do your work for you. Except instead of a person, you're getting an algorithm to do it

引用自 Tamamo：

AI is not a tool, as it is akin to telling someone else to do your work for you. Except instead of a person, you're getting an algorithm to do it

引用自 Tamamo：

引用自 ツ Sergio ツ：

Alright, let's flag then all games made with Unity, Unreal Engine, Godot etc. Clearly, it's important to clarify the tools that have been used for making the games.

A wrench is a tool, it is designed to do a certain purpose with human effort. Photoshop is a tool, it is designed to do a certain purpose with human effort.

AI is not a tool, as it is akin to telling someone else to do your work for you. Except instead of a person, you're getting an algorithm to do it

引用自 Shreddy：

引用自 Tamamo：

A wrench is a tool, it is designed to do a certain purpose with human effort. Photoshop is a tool, it is designed to do a certain purpose with human effort.

AI is not a tool, as it is akin to telling someone else to do your work for you. Except instead of a person, you're getting an algorithm to do it

Every single thing on photoshop is algorithmically generated to some extent, with “tools” like the remove, generative fill, and generative expand going even further than that. I am sorry but if technology moving forward with new tools like what is now being described as “AI” is not acceptable for you then your time using a computer or the internet is over.

引用自 Wragan：

引用自 Shreddy：

Every single thing on photoshop is algorithmically generated to some extent, with “tools” like the remove, generative fill, and generative expand going even further than that. I am sorry but if technology moving forward with new tools like what is now being described as “AI” is not acceptable for you then your time using a computer or the internet is over.

What you are saying only applies to the new stuff. There are enough games, movies, series etc. to not having to touch the modern, AI generated slop for a good while. (Also, even if it's utilization had spread like some disease, there can still be some without it.)

My main point is that Steam should enforce a method that (could) lead to more transparency, while not giving the devs the option to not say anything. Of course, the devs CAN lie about it but that's different, if busted, than just not putting there an AI disclaimer.

引用自 Doctor Zalgo：

引用自 Wragan：

What you are saying only applies to the new stuff. There are enough games, movies, series etc. to not having to touch the modern, AI generated slop for a good while. (Also, even if it's utilization had spread like some disease, there can still be some without it.)

My main point is that Steam should enforce a method that (could) lead to more transparency, while not giving the devs the option to not say anything. Of course, the devs CAN lie about it but that's different, if busted, than just not putting there an AI disclaimer.

It's not going to be meaningful though because at a bare minimum every game is going to be using AI augmented coding.

引用自 Wragan：

引用自 Doctor Zalgo：

It's not going to be meaningful though because at a bare minimum every game is going to be using AI augmented coding.

Then tag all of them, and perhaps add a new filter to the store for it. Also, if the devs want to disclose the extend of the AI usage (if "it's just that" or more), then they can already do that. The users can decide what to do with the information. The point is that it must be there by default, not based on how honest the devs (or publishers or whoever sets up the store page) feel that particular day.

Spider (Boss, Spider, costs 1 TP)
ATK: 2
Spider is a card that can cause the player to lose the game.
When the player plays a Spider, they lose the game.

引用自 Ben Lubar：

引用自 Wragan：

Then tag all of them, and perhaps add a new filter to the store for it. Also, if the devs want to disclose the extend of the AI usage (if "it's just that" or more), then they can already do that. The users can decide what to do with the information. The point is that it must be there by default, not based on how honest the devs (or publishers or whoever sets up the store page) feel that particular day.

I've only used AI for one game development project ever. It was a card game where I had Microsoft's AI (back when GitHub Copilot was first announced) autocomplete a design document.

Here's an example of a card from that game:

Spider (Boss, Spider, costs 1 TP)
ATK: 2
Spider is a card that can cause the player to lose the game.
When the player plays a Spider, they lose the game.

I haven't felt the need to have a fictional person who has no idea what they're doing interfere with my projects since.